Afghanistan summaries here and here and here. Also this.
Pakistan summary here and here.
So how’s that thrice handed-off training going?
In a mud-walled village on the outskirts of the provincial capital of Qalat, police checkpoint commander Abdul Rasool complains he is tired of his country’s six-year war and longs for peace.
Despite Rasool’s appeal, he represents what the U.S. military thinks is wrong with Afghanistan’s police, a force wracked by corruption that was long neglected as the army took front and centre in securing the nation’s borders and fighting the insurgency.
Standing nearby, U.S. army Capt. Dave Perry points out that trucks are being “destroyed” close to the checkpoint the Afghan commander supervises. Perry mentors the Afghan police and is the project officer for a checkpoint consolidation plan which aims to clean up police crime in southern Afghanistan’s Zabul province.
Rasool, a slight, sun-weathered man appearing older than his 27 years, seems oblivious to the veiled accusation. “Maybe the situation is getting bad because we have a lot of checkpoints now, so more Taliban come,” he responded.
[snip]
“What we can’t have here is 8,000 ticked off policemen who are going to be joining the insurgency,” Maj. Gen. Robert Cone, commanding general of the U.S. Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, told IPS in a Kabul interview. The command is responsible for training and equipping the Afghan security forces.
[snip]
Until the United States took control of police training a few months ago, Afghan officers were taught to deal only with traditional police issues like domestic violence or bank robberies. Now the strategy is to give the police “survival skills,” said Kornish.
While some may describe the new training as military in nature, American forces refer to it as reality training. “Until the security situation in this country improves radically, police here are not going to be the police on the block back home — because if they try to do that they’re going to die,” he warned. Article
Noted FYI:
Portugal will cut its military presence in Afghanistan by more than 90 percent from August 2008, Defense Minister Nuno Severiano Teixeria told parliament, according to Lusa news agency.
Portugal will reduce its contribution to NATO’s International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF) from 162 soldiers to a single C-130 transport plane and 15 soldiers to train members of the Afghan army, the defence minister said during a parliamentary commission meeting. Article
Blurring the distinctions between providing info and material to news organizations and creating and managing news in toto.
When NATO put out a call for more equipment in southern Afghanistan, it was expecting guns and helicopters - not cameras and video-cataloguing gear.
But that’s what it got from Denmark: an offer of 1 million euros, or about C$1.4 million, to buy video equipment that will ultimately be used to deliver documented Taliban outrages to a television near you - or to the popular video website YouTube.
At the end of a two-day informal meeting of defence ministers in the Netherlands, NATO’s secretary general reiterated Thursday that the alliance needs to do a better job in public relations both in home countries and Afghanistan.
“What we can do is improve our public messaging,” Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told reporters.
“Part of that public messaging could be to show to the people - and they can draw their own conclusions - what our opponent, our enemy in Afghanistan, looks like; what they do.”
[snip]
Two weeks ago, de Hoop Scheffer made a pitch to declassify video surveillance footage shot by NATO forces throughout the Afghan conflict. Allied countries have a variety of electronic intelligence-gathering means at their disposal.
The Danes responded with an initiative to provide equipment to transfer and catalogue existing video taken by the various countries involved in fighting the insurgency war. There will also be cameras so that more video can be shot.
The alliance, for all its high-tech hardware and gizmos, does not have such a facility right now, said Canadian Col. Brett Boudreau, a spokesman for Gen. Ray Henault, head of NATO’s military council.
Faced with sagging support in countries like Canada and the Netherlands for the Afghan mission, NATO sees the videos as a way of shoring up public opinion.
But one man’s YouTube video could be another man’s propoganda. De Hoop Scheffer bristled at such a suggestion in questions from a Danish journalist. Article
Hmm.
Not even top name celebrities were able to save Olympus Security Group from being shut by police in Afghanistan this week.
The UK-based company affiliate, which works with show business clients, recently became the eighth private security company to be closed in three weeks as part of a crackdown on an industry that has hitherto operated with near impunity. Article
While he may publicly remove the uniform, plans seem afoot to cast it as a smothering shroud of ensconced and instituionalized repression (emphasis added).
The Pakistan government is promulgating an ordinance which will enable court martial trials of civilians under the Pakistan Army Act, Attorney General Malik Qayyum has confirmed.
“Some new offences would be added to the Army Act to cover civilians,” Qayyum said, confirming that the ordinance would come in the next few days.
According to Qayyum, the proposed amendment to the Army Act would also redefine the role of agencies by giving them more powers of arbitrary detentions.
About the addition of more offences to the Army Act, Qayyum said they included abduction, use of arms, terrorism and others. He said the amended law would definitely apply to any such offence committed by tribal militants and other people.
The director general of the Inter Services Public Relations, however, denied having knowledge on the issue. The amendment to the existing law is the second attempt being made to include civilians in the Army Act after 1977.
[snip]
The proposed amendments to the Army Act would also further empower the intelligence agencies by allowing them make arbitrary detentions of civilians without framing any charges and to keep them in custody for an indefinite period. Article
Whatever euphemisms may evolve, martial law by any other name (emphasis added).
…Almost the entire North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) and Federally Administered Tribal Areas have revolted against the state of Pakistan in favor of the Taliban. And polls conducted by US institutions suggest the hunt for al-Qaeda is extremely unpopular in Pakistan, which also faces wave after wave of suicide attacks in its bigger cities.
[snip]
A local television station has shown footage of people collecting money for what they call the “mujahideen”. The station reported that at one place in the Swat Valley, people collected Rs1.5 million (about US$24,500) in just three hours. Such popular support for the militancy forces Islamabad to question whether it should continue this losing battle, or launch a full-scale war against terror.
However - and this is crucial - should Musharraf decide on the latter approach, he would need to do so under special powers, such as martial law or a state of emergency.
Asia Times Online contacts confirm that in the past three days Musharraf has held several high-level meetings that included all four provincial chief ministers. The discussions centered on the issue of extraordinary powers. The same issue was raised with the policy planning section of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League.
[snip]
A senior security official speaking to Asia Times Online on condition of anonymity, said, “Major surgeries are essential in cases like Lal Masjid [a militant mosque in Islamabad], but such extraordinary events need extraordinary powers. If the courts intervene in such matters, the security forces will stop working and nobody will be able to stop the march of the Taliban into the bigger cities of Pakistan.”
The official continued, “This is a major crossroads in the ‘war on terror’ at which Washington will have to approve an all-powerful government, even at the cost of democracy. Otherwise it can say goodbye to Pakistan as a ‘war on terror’ ally as it [Pakistan] would simply not be able to get results.” Article
Monitoring the ‘election’ pressure cooker.
#1:
Pakistan’s Supreme Court is unlikely to rule on the legality of President Pervez Musharraf’s re-election before mid-November, the presiding judge says.
Justice Javed Iqbal also said the court would not be intimidated by threats to impose an emergency or martial law.
[snip]
“If this case does not conclude by tomorrow it will not be heard next week due to engagements of one of the judges and will be then heard on 12 November.”
That would make the timing tight as President Musharraf’s term expires on 15 November, and he is due to announce the date of general elections due by mid-January.
The main lawyer for the petitioners accused the government of using delaying tactics.
Justice Iqbal also said the Supreme Court would not be taken “hostage”.
“No threat will have any effect on this bench, whether it is martial law or [a state of] emergency,” he said. “Whatever will happen, it will be according to the constitution and rules.” Article
#2:
“You (US) twisted our (Pakistan) hand” to allow former Pakistani Prime Minister Bhutto into the country, and “America has this notion they are the best judge. They might as well hold the election in Washington.”
It is a practice in most countries what the leader is unable to say are being told through a junior official, and this is exactly what Deputy Information Minister Tariq Azim Khan told USA Today in a forthright expression of Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf’s sentiments that were undoubtedly taken seriously by the U.S. State Department and the Bush administration.
USA Today in a major reporting piece carried in its Wednesday edition opens its report saying “the United States pressured Pakistan to allow former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto to return from exile, promoting her as a moderate influence in a country facing a growing threat from Islamic extremists, a Pakistani government spokesman said.”
“She says what America wants to hear,” Deputy Information Minister Khan said in a weekend interview with USA Today. He said the U.S. government forced a reluctant Pakistan to allow her to return after eight years of self-imposed exile:” You twisted our arm.” Article
Further fallout from this past spring’s Chaudhry crisis.
Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday sentenced former top officers of the capital police to short prison terms for manhandling the country’s Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry in March when he was suspended for allegations of misuse of authority. The five police officers, who included former Islamabad police chief and his deputy, were convicted of mistreating Chaudhry when he tried to walk to the Supreme Court building on March 13.
Television footage on the day showed police pushing the top judge and later nudging him into an official limousine, which he had refused to ride.
The officers’ counsel made a verbal request to the three-member bench to review its verdict, on which the apex court suspended the sentences and directed the guilty men to file formal pleas.
The jail terms vary between 15 days and one month for each officer, but the counsel’s plea for review put the implementation of the verdict on hold. Article
Some more:
A three-member bench headed by Judge Rana Baghwandas handed down the sentences to former Islamabad police chief Chaudhry Iftikhar and Senior Superintendent of Police Zafar Iqbal, who have already been transferred from their positions over the incident. Deputy Superintendent of Police Jameel Hashmi, Inspector Rukhsar Mehdi and guard Siraj were handed down jail sentences of one month each.
The court had earlier sentenced Islamabad Commissioner Khalid Pervez and Deputy Commissioner Muhammad Ali, but their sentences were suspended following appeals by the two officials seeking pardon.
Those sentenced yesterday have 15 days to appeal the verdict.
Another bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry ordered top government officials to file a comprehensive report on the Oct. 18 bombing that targeted former Premier Benazir Bhutto in Karachi, killing 139 people. The court expressed impatience with the investigation that has yet to identify the culprits or their motive.
Chaudhry, leading the four-member panel of judges, ordered the senior officials to file a “comprehensive report” on the bombing within a week, at which time the next hearing will be set. Article